Philosophical versus Rhetorical Approaches to Education Essay

Philosophical versus Rhetorical Approaches to Education - Essay ExampleSurely, polished speaking at the expense of truth is not the federal agency to go, but unfortunately we live in a society were people are judged based on how they speak as well as how they represent and what they truly believe. Therefore, the ability to speak well and influence people is important in a liberal arts education. In addition, being a truth seeker is just as important if not more important in the liberal arts. This is why a combination of the two is necessary. Isocrates school of panorama is much more practical when compared to Platos school of thought. However, both of them deal with higher education and are not in complete conflict with apiece other. Although there is a continual palisade in liberal arts between Isocrates rhetorical tradition and Platos philosophical tradition, certain experts would argue that the debate is necessary and adds to the culture of higher education. The debate does have wider implications. Currently, it can be observed that many people do not trust their government officials because they receive they are purely rhetoricians and hardly ever speak the truth. This is something that Plato warns us about and it is why he believed that those who are in positions of power should be focused on seeking and professing the truth and not just speaking cleverly to gain power and money.