Family Divorce ( You Must use research it from a feminist perspective) Paper

Family Divorce ( You Must use it from a womens liberationist perspective) - Research Paper ExampleThe same case is replicated in Europe where the rates of split cause been on the increase in the recent decades and is expected to escalate even further in the plan of attack years. It is such disturbing trends that have prompted studies into understanding the cause and possible interventions of divorce.The feminist perspective on divorce revolves around the ways in which womens positions at divorce systematically differ from mens positions. Although the current labour force trends indicate an increase in women scattericipation, Carbone (1994) says there is no corresponding full in the fathers domestic contributions. In fact, women still endure the burden of child rearing. In a nutshell, therefore, a feminist perspective is concerned about the implications of divorce non only on the lives of women but overly on the lives of children.Divorce has a huge impact on the family for the simple reason that it breaks the bonds that were once prudent for bringing the family together. On the part of children, Carbone (1994) says divorce brings the feelings of being unwanted and loss of trust to the parents. On the part of the fathers, divorce leads to loss of finances, emotional stress following loss of family and having to start again and loss of enatic responsibility. With regards to the mothers, divorce leads to financial stress and emotional stress just to mention a few. Sometimes these effects deteriorate even to the extended families.Divorce shams serious concerns on the family, in particular, the well-being of the children. Although the adults are in like manner affected by divorce, the children bear the brunt of it all. The divorce causes psychological, physical and socio-economic problems onto the affected families. This is in contrast to families that do not experience divorce.Wallerstein (1991) identifies persistent loneliness as a major consequence of d ivorce on children. He cited a study in